With a final decision of the Supreme Court, she lost custody of her 7-year-old child from the first marriage of the former Playmate.
Marketing graduate, 1.76 m tall. and impeccably proportioned, at the age of 22, she participated in the beauty contest organized by "Playboy" magazine and even received the title of alternate Playmate.
Her family owns a hotel business, but she had a dream of becoming a top model.
The alternate Playmate married in 2015 and in less than two months gave birth to her son A.
But the couple's married life did not go smoothly and after about two years, the Playmate "left the family roof". The child lived with his father, while being cared for by his grandmother and grandfather.
Subsequently, by an interim order of the competent presiding judge, custody of the child was awarded to the father and the mother's right of contact with their child was regulated.
This was followed by a decision of the Athens Court of First Instance, which again awarded exclusive custody of the minor child to the father, and later the Athens Court of Appeal upheld the same custody regime.
However, the top model continued her legal claim, asking the Supreme Court to overturn the court of appeal's decision.
As the appellants report, the trial court had appointed a medical expert who had conducted several sessions with both parents and the minor child in the presence of his parents.
Revealingly, the expert report noted that during the sessions the alternate Playmate Playmate reported "as her biggest flaw that she is very short-tempered and generally swears and curses."
[P[/P]During the sessions she indicated that she "caused frequent vomiting herself" (even though she attributed it to stress) which refers to a certain type of eating disorder pathology and can be associated with people who are preoccupied with fashion, appearance, etc. However, no one seems to have been concerned about this in the past (neither the husband nor the doctors)."
Elsewhere the expert records the finding that "the bond between the minor child and his father as established is very close", but also that "the minor has a fairly good relationship with both his parents who show love towards him".
The adjudicators do not fail to mention that the child "has resided with his father since his mother left the family home, in a stable family environment, for a sufficient period of time already, and he has been a good father where he takes care of him with love, in his care, and his parents have also been contributing daily since his birth, and such a change in the present situation would not be in his best interests, combined with the fact that his mother has already married and has had a minor child, facts which must be taken into account, as all this would constitute a sudden change in his life'.
In fact, it is noted that this joint residence of father and child has created a special bond of love between them, "so that any removal of the child from his (father's) familiar and intimate environment will create a feeling of insecurity with adverse effects on his psychosomatic development".
Finally, the jury rejected as unfounded all the claims of the top model and awarded her court costs of 2,700 euros.
Source.gr
Contents of this article including associated images are belongs Cyprus Times
Views & opinions expressed are those of the author and/or Cyprus Times
Source
