What Roula Pispirigou supports in her apologetic memo What she focuses on
Roula Pispirigou's apologetic memo is based on the basic claim that the time of action of ketamine found in 9-year-old Georgina's body does not coincide with the time of her death.
- "Die slayer" they shouted at Roula Pispirigou. Under draconian measures in the interrogation room (video)
- They had seen Roula Pispirigou beating 10-month-old Tzortzina, says Giannopoulos from "Smile of the Child"[/URL][/B]
- Patras: Information about 9-year-old Tzortzina's emergency within the day, according to Greek media[/B]
- 1985... Kordelio: The forgotten story of the horrific child murderer who reminds us of Patras[/B]
- The fatal mistake of Roulas Pispirigou and the scenarios for the motives of the horrible crime
According to reports, the accused of "manslaughter with intent" in order to convince the investigator and the prosecutor that it was a "medical error" allegedly describes in her memo that the episode of Georgina took place on the 14th.30 in the afternoon but the child had a pulse until 15.10.
That is, according to her defense claim, efter the child should have ended up in 20 minutes, as the doctors have mentioned about the effect of ketamine in such quantity, therefore she has nothing to do with the incident since the child finally ended up after 40 minutes.
Regarding the existence or not of ketamine in the Children's Hospital, the accused allegedly counters that it is not possible that this substance does not exist in this hospital, as it is administered in veterinary medicine and pediatric surgery.
Source: cnn.gr
Contents of this article including associated images are belongs Cyprus Times
Views & opinions expressed are those of the author and/or Cyprus Times
Source