Michael Terrepeis issued a written statement regarding the lawsuit he filed and the decision.
As he says, among other things, the leadership of the EDEK may "celebrate" this decision, but on the merits, it must reflect on the findings[/B] of the Court.
At the same time, it insists on methodologies
In detail:
"Yesterday the Nicosia District Court decided in relation to the Interlocutory Application which I filed in the context of my Lawsuit and in which I requested on the merits, among other things, the issuance of orders prohibiting the Defendants (K.S. EDEK) to implement the decisions of the "Extraordinary Congress of the S. EDEK C.C." dated. 24/10/2021 with which it was decided to suspend my status as Secretary of the Central Committee and as a member of the Credentials Committee of the Congress - Decree which I recall was issued unilaterally on 01/11/2021 as well as a decree prohibiting the Defendants from implementing the decision of the "Extraordinary Congress of the C.E.C.E.S.C. EDEK" to keep the Register of Members of the Defendants in the possession of the President of the C.C. EDEK, despite the express provision of the Statute that the Register of Members is in the possession of the Secretary of the Central Committee.
In short, the Court decided to annul the Decree which was issued on 01/11/2021 and to dismiss the remaining decrees, for the reason as noted in its decision that it considers that the fact that he will not be re-elected as a member of the Central Committee and by extension as Secretary of the Central Committee, and that in any event my term of office would come to an end in a short period of time, the non-issuance of the Orders would not cause me any irreparable damage. For this reason, the Court decided that the issues raised should be decided on the merits of the Application.
Although the Court's decision effectively rejects my interim application seeking interim interim relief, I feel that it prima facie vindicates the merits of my case. I note in particular that the Court's judgment states that "there are prima facie indications that there is a visible likelihood of success of his claim against the Defendants on the basis of the alleged taking of substituted decisions by the Pancyprian Congress of Defendants which concerned the Plaintiff without him being heard".
The leadership of the NPC may "celebrate" this decision, but on the merits it must reflect on the Court's findings on the merits of the case. For my part, I would like to note that I wish to have the case heard as soon as possible and that I hope that soon the Court will be able to do real justice.
Most importantly, however, Mr. Sizopoulos and his associates engineered the holding of a replacement congress and elections, violating the decree that was in force and annulling the Court's decision before it was issued."
Contents of this article including associated images are belongs to Cyprus Times
Views & opinions expressed are those of the author and/or Cyprus Times
Source[/URL]Cyprus Times[/SIZE]
Source
